Test Video Iphone 11 Pro

Please note: In October 2020, we updated the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Version 4 now includes image preview tests and a broad range of new test scenes as part of our new trustability evaluation which measures the photographic camera'southward ability to deliver consistent all the same image and video quality across all shooting scenarios. We take retested this device using the new version four of the test protocol and produced this completely updated review. For more information, please see our article virtually preview, trustability and other version 4 updates of the DXOMARK Photographic camera test protocol.

The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, which has been supplanted by the iPhone 12 Pro Max flagship in October, features a half-dozen.5-inch Super Retina XDR OLED brandish, A13 Bionic chipset, and up to 512 GB of internal storage. It is the first iPhone to come with a triple-camera setup. Next to the primary wide-angle and the tele-photographic camera, which both offer the same focal length as on the predecessor XS Max, there's now too an ultra-wide photographic camera with a xiii mm-equivalent field of view.

On the image processing side of things, the Apple tree'southward Deep Fusion engineering uses the chipset's neural engine and avant-garde machine learning to perform pixel-by-pixel optimization for better textures, lower noise, and a wider dynamic range. Read our full review following to notice out how the new components play together. (You can notice out more about some of the iPhone 11 Pro Max's new imaging features, including the redesigned camera interface, seamless zooming in video, live bokeh, and HDR preview, in this previous article.)

Key camera specifications:

Triple-photographic camera setup
Primary: 12 MP 1/two.55″ sensor, 26 mm-equivalent f/i.8-discontinuity lens, PDAF, OIS
Ultra-broad: 12 MP sensor, 13 mm-equivalent f/two.iv-aperture lens
Tele: 12 MP 1/3.four″ sensor, 52 mm-equivalent f/ii.0-aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
Quad-LED dual-tone flash
4K video, 2160p/60 fps (1080p/30 fps default)

About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone photographic camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than than ii.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera's default settings. This commodity is designed to highlight the most of import results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available hither.

Exam summary

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max

124

photographic camera

105

104

forty

101

With an overall DXOMARK Camera score of 124, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max secures a respectable ranking in our database. Though manifestly not every bit impressive relative to the best of the contest as it was when nosotros first reviewed it over a year ago, this iPhone remains a very capable imaging tool. Its Photograph score under our new testing protocol is 132, putting it in the in the top ten for this particular sub-score.

The main photographic camera captures plenty of detail under nigh atmospheric condition, though racket is a bit higher than we'd like to see. Exposures are accurate all manner down to low low-cal levels and dynamic range is fairly wide, though this year-sometime iPhone can't keep upwardly with the best devices now available when it comes to extreme dissimilarity: we saw more blown highlights in those situations than with the latest HDR leaders. Color remains a strong bespeak for this iPhone, with very nicely saturated colors in outdoor scenes and pleasantly rendered peel tones. White balance is ordinarily accurate, though colour casts are sometimes visible when shooting indoors.

Images captured on the iPhone eleven Pro Max prove mostly good exposure, fairly broad dynamic range, and pleasant color rendering.

When shooting in bokeh simulation style, this iPhone achieves practiced results, but is not among the best. Slight depth estimation errors are visible in all conditions, just noise on subjects and in the background are improved compared to the XS Max.

In very low calorie-free, the iPhone's image quality drops noticeably, with less detail and more dissonance in photos than the best of the competition.

Dark cityscapes are of acceptable quality, though the flash sometimes fires unnecessarily.

With a zoom score of 59 the the iPhone xi Pro Max isn't quite up with the very all-time for this test category. The camera has a 2x tele-camera module, a spec that's looking a bit dated at present that so many flagship phones offer longer focal lengths for zooming in more. The tele-camera is quite capable at its native focal length, then brusque zoom images look good, but quality suffers at medium and long zoom ranges, with more noise and less detail than the ameliorate competition.

Bokeh mode is capable of achieving adept results, but is not among the all-time nosotros take seen.

On the broad end, the iPhone remains more than current, with its 13.7 mm-equivalent field of view (measured) offering more coverage than many recent competitors. Epitome quality is acceptable, with nice color rendering, though noise is higher and detail lower than is ideal.

The ultra-broad photographic camera offers a very wide field of view.

The zoom provides good results at close range.

With a Video score of 109 the iPhone flagship remains amid the all-time smartphones for recording moving images under under new test protocol. Apple tree was early on to HDR video and the iPhone 11 Pro Max does a very good task recording clips of loftier dynamic range scenes, even by belatedly 2020 standards. Exposure is too otherwise quite good, darkening substantially only at really low illumination levels. At 4K resolution, the iPhone records highly detailed video with depression dissonance in proficient light, though noise becomes more of an consequence when light levels drop. Color is vivid and pleasant, though white balance tin be a little unstable when recording indoors.

The iPhone 11 Pro Max records nice 4K videos, but exposure instabilities can be visible in the heaven.

Video autofocus is very smooth, with proficient tracking capabilities, and stabilization is very effective in most situations. Only when recording while walking is a jello consequence frequently visible in the iPhone's video clips.

Photo scores explained

The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max achieves a Photograph score of 132 points. The Photograph score is calculated from sub-scores in tests that examine different aspects of a device'due south performance for still images nether different lighting conditions. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were adamant and compare image quality confronting some fundamental competitors.

Exposure and Contrast

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max

ninety

111

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Best: Laurels Magic4 Ultimate (111)

The iPhone xi Pro Max exposes accurately, even in depression-calorie-free conditions. However, as we can run into in the entropy nautical chart below (which measures dynamic range at several dissimilarity levels), the iPhone struggles with a 7EV spread between lite and dark. Information technology usually does better than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, just the Huawei P40 Pro provides much better (and consistent) dynamic range across the tested light and contrast levels.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, contrast entropy measurements from 20 to 1000lux / 2 to 7EV

In the comparison below, the iPhone loses highlights in the sky, while the Huawei does a very good job of maintaining highlight and shadow detail. The Xiaomi does better with the sky than the Apple, but the primary subject exposure is a little low.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor exposure, clipped heaven

Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor exposure, good heaven particular

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor exposure, slightly clipped sky, underexposed subject

The iPhone generally exposes well in low-light scenes with low to middling contrast, only as in bright light, high dynamic range poses problems. In the challenging indoor lighting of the next example, the iPhone holds the highlight item in the background but badly underexposes the model. The Huawei delivers a nicely balanced exposure, while the Xiaomi loses the highlights while leaving the model's face a bit as well nighttime.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, low-calorie-free exposure, dark shadows

Huawei P40 Pro, low-light exposure, good exposure

Xiaomi Mi x Ultra, depression-low-cal exposure, diddled highlights, somewhat dark shadows

Color

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

105

107

Apple tree iPhone 13 Pro Max

Best: Apple tree iPhone xiii Pro Max (107)

The iPhone's 11 Pro Max delivers excellent color in outdoor conditions, achieving highest score of all devices tested under the latest version of DXOMARK Photographic camera to date. Equally in previous models, Apple has tuned the camera for images to come out very slightly yellowish, which is well inside acceptable limits and in about situations makes for pleasant results, though indoors this can appear every bit a slightly less desirable color cast. Even in very low light, colour rendering remains pretty expert despite more obvious color casts.

In the examples below, the iPhone actually delivers the most authentic and neutral colour rendering, while the reference devices run warmer.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor color, accurate, bright color

Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor color, slightly warm cast

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor color, slightly warm cast

Autofocus

Apple tree iPhone eleven Pro Max

104

109

Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

Best: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109)

The iPhone xi Pro Max'south autofocus performed well in our lab tests and in existent-life shooting alike. It is very accurate and locks on quickly in lighting conditions all the way down to a low 20 lux, slowing downwards (as do many phones) only in the near-darkness of our 5 lux exam.

The iPhone's good subjective autofocus functioning was backed up by our previous testing protocol, and this continues to be the example with our updated test protocol, which includes HDR scenes. In this comparison graph nosotros see that in loftier-dissimilarity conditions (a difference of 7EV between the darkest and brightest function of the scene), the Apple and the Xiaomi focus quickly and accurately, with the Apple tree having the nigh consistent functioning of all three phones. The new test protocol as well reveals that the Huawei P40 Pro, which focused very speedily under the former testing atmospheric condition, takes longer when faced with a loftier dynamic range target.

AF comparison HDR scene (7EV)

In the next example, we see that all 3 phones focus accurately in low light. Thanks to a wide depth of field, the iPhone and Xiaomi go along both faces in abrupt focus, while the Huawei leaves the farther face very slightly soft.

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max, depth of field

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, bailiwick and background in focus

Huawei P40 Pro, depth of field

Huawei P40 Pro, ingather, subject area sharp, background softer

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, depth of field

Xiaomi Mi x Ultra, crop, subject and background in focus

Texture

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max

111

Xiaomi Mi eleven

Best: Xiaomi Mi 11 (111)

Noise

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

102

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (102)

The iPhone eleven Pro Max nicely balances noise and detail, though the very best devices tin can do a piffling meliorate. In the chart below, based on data from our new AI-based texture measurement protocol, we see that all 3 devices are very close in vivid light, simply a gap opens upwardly betwixt the iPhone's texture functioning and the other two as light levels drop (though the Xiaomi rejoins the Apple tree at the everyman tested light level).

In the instance below, we see that all three phones capture a lot of detail and continue noise well under command. The Xiaomi uses more ambitious sharpening.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor texture and noise

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, first-class item

Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor texture and noise

Huawei P40 Pro, crop, fantabulous detail

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor texture and noise

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, ingather, excellent detail

In low light, every bit the test data suggests, the iPhone's functioning drops more than noticeably behind the P40 Pro's impressive showing. The example below, shot at extremely dim one lux illumination, shows that the iPhone retains less particular while displaying more noise than the Huawei.

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, low-calorie-free texture and noise

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, good detail, noise

Huawei P40 Pro, low-light texture and noise

Huawei P40 Pro, crop, first-class texture and dissonance

Artifacts

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max

Google Pixel 6

Best: Google Pixel 6 (77)

The Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max photographic camera by and large controls image artifacts very well, which is why the device achieves a high score in this category. When viewing images at full size, some ringing can be visible along high-contrast edges, but it's ordinarily non likewise intrusive. Our testers also found flare artifacts in a pocket-size number of our sample images, such as in the shot below, but the iPhone by and large controls flare well.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, image flare

Huawei Mate thirty Pro, image flare

Samsung Milky way Note x+ 5G, no flare

Bokeh

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Huawei P50 Pro

Best: Huawei P50 Pro (80)

The Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max achieves a adept score for bokeh. It's a slight improvement over the XS Max, mainly considering of lower racket levels, but information technology is not quite on the same level as the very best competitors.

Some pocket-sized depth estimation errors are visible in the sample beneath, but its portrait style images show decent depth estimation as well as a nice bokeh shape and gradient, making for quite natural-looking results overall.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, bokeh simulation

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, ingather, depth estimation errors

Apple iPhone XS Max, bokeh simulation

Apple iPhone XS Max, crop, depth estimation errors

Nosotros tin see in the comparison to the Milky way Notation ten+ 5G below that the Samsung device is capable of separating the foreground subject from the groundwork more precisely. Some depth estimation artifacts are visible effectually the subject in the Apple paradigm; they are much less intrusive in the Samsung prototype.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, bokeh simulation

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, some depth interpretation errors

Samsung Galaxy Notation 10+ 5G, bokeh simulation

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, ingather, good depth interpretation

Nighttime

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Huawei Mate forty Pro+

All-time: Huawei Mate xl Pro+ (82)

The iPhone 11 Pro Max accomplished a Night score of 50. Images show good exposure as well as natural white residual and colour rendering, even in difficult mixed lighting situations, and good skin tones in portrait shots. On the downside, we saw some clipping in illuminated areas of the scene and some slight ghosting on moving subjects.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, night scene, flash off

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather, decent detail, some noise

Huawei Mate xxx Pro, night scene, wink off

Huawei Mate thirty Pro, crop, splendid detail, low noise

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, dark scene, wink off

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, crop, lack of particular

Flash-auto fashion, on the other hand, leaves some room for improvement. The photographic camera captures fairly good detail in this fashion, but noise is quite visible and the wink sometimes triggers for landscape shots where it cannot aid illuminate the scene. Nosotros also saw some overexposure on faces in portrait shots, resulting in highlight clipping on pare tones and inaccurate color rendering.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, night portrait, flash-auto mode, overexposure

Preview

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Apple iPhone thirteen Pro Max

All-time: Apple iPhone xiii Pro Max (eighty)

The iPhone eleven Pro Max is the all-time device we've tested for preview image quality so far, cheers to accurate exposure and bokeh representation, as well as good zoom smoothness. HDR video technologies ensure the device is able to handle highlights well in its preview paradigm. And then even in high-contrast scenes, what y'all see in preview is very close to the final capture.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, preview: Video HDR processing technologies ensure that highlights are well preserved in loftier-contrast scenes.

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max, capture: What you see is what you go as both highlights and shadows are very close to the preview epitome in the final capture.

Occasionally when shooting portraits in high-dissimilarity scenes, preview prioritizes the effulgence of the face at the expense of preserving highlights. And so some particular is lost in the sky compared to the final capture, just even in these examples, highlight preservation is better than many other devices we've tested. The device'southward main weakness is some slight underexposure and visible racket in depression light, simply these issues remain pocket-sized overall.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, Preview, minor differences in colour rendering and slight underexposure are axiomatic when faces are detected in high-contrast scenes.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, capture, colors are richer and highlights meliorate exposed in the final capture compared to the preview image.

Bokeh rendering in preview is pretty good, thanks to its uniform blur in the background and good bailiwick isolation. Activation isn't perfect, and although it occasionally fails to display every bit yous switch over to portrait manner, taking a step closer to your subject ordinarily helps. The depth-of-field effect is stronger in the final image, and the blur slope issue is more realistic than the preview initially suggests, but these issues are once again fairly pocket-size and the iPhone eleven Pro Max'south bokeh preview is reassuringly convincing.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, preview: When activated, bokeh simulation in portrait manner shows consistent blur in the background and accurate depth estimation.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, capture: Background blur is potent and blur gradient more pronounced in the last paradigm, but reasonably shut to preview.

Skillful parallax alignment and effective image fusion between multiple cameras delivers pleasant smoothness when compression zooming on the iPhone 11 Pro Max. Focus is excellent, besides, with the preview epitome remaining abrupt at all focal lengths as you zoom in. Exposure adaption is also fairly responsive, aside from some minor exposure instabilities that our testers observed under bright light conditions.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, zoom preview

Zoom scores explained

The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max achieves a Zoom score of 59 points. The Zoom score is calculated from the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer await at how these sub-scores were accomplished and compare zoom image quality against some primal competitors.

Tele

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max

140

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Best: Accolade Magic4 Ultimate (140)

Like its predecessor XS Max, the iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with a 2x optical tele-lens that offers a 52 mm-equivalent field of view. With this setup, the Apple device usually achieves expert zoom results at shut zoom ranges, despite limited dynamic range, but at medium and long range, it cannot proceed upward with the 3x and 5x tele-modules that some competitors at present offer. Noise is visible in all calorie-free conditions.

At the brusk (2x) zoom range, detail is usually good. In the case beneath, which was shot in depression light at 5 lux, the iPhone produces a satisfying photograph, though it lacks the dynamic range of the Huawei's output and also shows more noise (only a similar level of detail).

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max, close-range zoom, depression light

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather, less dynamic range, more noise

Huawei P40 Pro, shut-range zoom, low light

Huawei P40 Pro, crop, more dynamic range, less noise

Our testers as well noticed that sometimes at short zoom ranges where you'd expect the 2x tele camera module to accept over, the iPhone instead cropped from its main camera, resulting in substantially lower-quality output than usual.

At medium zoom ranges, the 11 Pro Max captures less detail than nosotros'd hope, with quite a flake of noise in the epitome. In the scene below, the Google Pixel 4 captures more clean particular despite having a 2x zoom module like the iPhone. The Huawei, with its longer tele-module, predictably does meliorate than both.

Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max, medium-range zoom, outdoors

Apple tree iPhone eleven Pro Max, crop, loss of detail, strong noise

Google Pixel 4, medium-range zoom, outdoors

Google Pixel iv, ingather, good detail, some noise

Huawei P40 Pro, medium-range zoom, outdoors

Huawei P40 Pro, ingather, first-class detail, low noise

At long zoom ranges, the 11 Pro Max can'' keep up with most phones that have 3x or 5x tele-modules, and detail drops substantially.

Wide

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All-time: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (58)

The iPhone 11 Pro Max was the first Apple device to feature an ultra-wide photographic camera. At 13 mm (xiii.7 mm measured), it offers ane of the widest fields of view currently bachelor, close to such Samsung devices as the Note ten+ and the Galaxy S10+. Overall, the image quality of the ultra-wide camera is quite far from the level of the primary module, just that is true for almost current smartphones.

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, ultra-wide, 13.vii mm-equivalent focal length

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, ultra-broad, 13 mm-equivalent focal length

The 11 Pro Max'southward Wide score is close to that of the Milky way Note 10+ 5G (42), just as with the primary camera, the two devices utilise a unlike texture/noise tradeoff. The Apple images bear witness more detail than the Samsung, but are generally also noisier. Color rendering is adept and anamorphosis (deformation of faces) is visible nearer the edges of the frame, simply considering the wide field of view of the lens, it is quite well controlled.

In the indoor sample shot below, you tin meet that the level of detail in these conditions is not on the aforementioned level as the primary camera, only the Apple is slightly better than its Samsung rival. Dissonance is less visible in the Samsung image, even so.

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, ultra-broad indoors

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, loss of detail, some finely-grained noise

Samsung Galaxy Notation 10+ 5G, ultra-wide indoors

Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, crop, lack of item, coarse racket

Video scores explained

With an overall Video score 109 points, the Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max does quite well in our new test protocol, slotting into our database just a few positions downward from the top. The overall Video score is derived from results across a range of tests in the same mode as the Photo score: Exposure (95), Color (95), Autofocus (101), Texture (76), Noise (xc), Artifacts (80), and Stabilization (98). At default settings, the iPhone eleven Pro Max records video at 1080p Full Hard disk drive resolution and thirty frames per second, but it achieves the best results at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second which we take tested for this review.

The iPhone 11 Pro Max earns a solid exposure score. In the nautical chart below, nosotros run across that exposure does driblet more than in very depression low-cal than with the top-scoring Huawei P40 Pro, but this is notwithstanding a reasonably stiff showing. Our testers did annotation some exposure instabilities when shooting outdoors, however.

Video exposure comparison

The iPhone 11 Pro Max's skillful exposure score is partly due to its ability to capture scenes with wide dynamic range, belongings on to both highlights and shadows in high-dissimilarity atmospheric condition. We run into this in the video comparison beneath, forth with the high levels of item that the iPhone retains in good low-cal.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor video

Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor video

The nautical chart below shows that detail does drib off more than than some competitors as the light level decreases, though the Huawei does eventually descend to rejoin the iPhone at the everyman illumination tested.

Noise is also well controlled until conditions become very dim, when strong luminance noise becomes visible.

Every bit with stills, the iPhone 11 Pro Max generally records brilliant, pleasant color in videos, though white balance casts are sometimes noticeable and our testers saw occasional color instabilities when shooting indoors.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor video

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor video

The iPhone controls artifacts well, but our testers did note some jello consequence visible when walking or panning.

The autofocus system is not the fastest we have seen, but it's fast plenty. Further, it is very stable, operates very smoothly, and provides good tracking. Equally with previous iPhone generations, the 11 Pro Max stabilizes video very effectively.

Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max, low-light video

Conclusion

Nether the latest version 4 of our Camera test protocol the Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max remains a very bonny option merely has lost some ground compared to the best competitors since it was launched more than than a year agone. It's still more than than capable of capturing nice still images. Color is particularly impressive and the all-time preview mode we take tested to date helps getting exposure and framing right easily. It as well does an excellent job for video recording and is one of the best smartphones for recording in difficult high-contrast situations. Overall, the iPhone 11 Pro Max is however an easy recommendation, especially if you're already invested in the Apple tree eco-system.

Pros

Skillful levels of particular in most tested conditions
Accurate white balance indoors and out
Pleasant colour saturation and natural skin tones
Accurate target exposure and wide dynamic range in nearly situations
Fast, authentic, and repeatable autofocus
Very wide ultra-wide lens, with adept dynamic range, and well-controlled chromatic aberrations
Broad dynamic range when shooting video
High detail and depression noise when shooting video
Vivid and pleasant colors in videos
Effective stabilization for video

Cons

Dissonance visible in all light conditions
Fine details lost in low light
Loss of detail in long-range zoom shots
Lack of detail in wink images
Noise in ultra-broad images
Jello effect visible when walking or panning
Unstable white balance indoors in videos
Exposure instabilities outdoors in videos
Very visible luminance racket in depression-light videos

Please also accept a expect at our Apple iPhone 11 Max Pro gallery beneath. It includes images that have been shot in a multifariousness of situations and shooting modes for you to view and examine.

Shutter Speed : one/231 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/i.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/666 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/ane.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/694 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.viii

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : one/33 sec

ISO : 400

F-number : f/one.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/156 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/121 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/121 sec

ISO : 100

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : Due north.A

ISO : N.A

F-number : Northward.A

35mm Equivalent focal length : N.A

Shutter Speed : 1/113 sec

ISO : 125

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/30 sec

ISO : 800

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : i/25 sec

ISO : 640

F-number : f/one.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : i/8 sec

ISO : 1000

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/3049 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/i.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 26 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/14 sec

ISO : 500

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 1/406 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/ii

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Bokeh simulation manner

Shutter Speed : one/121 sec

ISO : 64

F-number : f/i.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/viii sec

ISO : 500

F-number : f/i.eight

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Night mode

Night way

Shutter Speed : 1/8 sec

ISO : 640

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Night mode

Night manner

Shutter Speed : 14/9901 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/8 sec

ISO : 640

F-number : f/one.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Night mode

Night fashion

Shutter Speed : one/551 sec

ISO : twenty

F-number : f/two

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Bokeh simulation style

Shutter Speed : 3/3886 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : i/251 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 1/215 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : i/50 sec

ISO : 64

F-number : f/1.viii

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/1295 sec

ISO : xx

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 1/100 sec

ISO : 100

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/33 sec

ISO : 125

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 31/102649 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/one.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : i/236 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/two

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Bokeh simulation fashion

Shutter Speed : 12/5891 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 24/57971 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : i/14 sec

ISO : 800

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 1/50 sec

ISO : 320

F-number : f/2.4

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : xx/57971 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/905 sec

ISO : twenty

F-number : f/ii

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Shutter Speed : 29/42522 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 1/1453 sec

ISO : 20

F-number : f/2

35mm Equivalent focal length : 52 mm

Bokeh simulation mode

Bokeh simulation style

Shutter Speed : 1/33 sec

ISO : 640

F-number : f/1.eight

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

Shutter Speed : 39/115727 sec

ISO : 32

F-number : f/1.8

35mm Equivalent focal length : 0 mm

A annotation about prototype formats for this review: The iPhone 11 Pro Max records photographs in the DCI-P3 colorspace, which their displays also apply. DCI-P3 is newer and larger than the sRGB color infinite that near devices use. So to ensure that the images we used in the review brandish properly on a wide diversity of browsers and devices, nosotros converted the originals from DCI-P3 to sRGB using Photoshop (which is why the published test photos show Photoshop as the creator). This can slightly reduce the richness of color in some cases from what you would run into when viewing the original images on a DCI-P3-calibrated display with advisable software. We also captured the original images using the new HEIF (Loftier-Efficiency Image Format), but then converted them to very high-quality JPEGs for viewing in standard browsers and epitome editing software. (HEIF is very similar to JPEG, but provides better compression for similar prototype quality, so the conversion makes the sample epitome file sizes larger than they were when shot.) Please note, however, that unlike our test images, some of the comparison photos used in this review were shot in JPEG and are used every bit-is for illustrative purposes; they were non used to compute scores.